Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court clarifying the legal definition of obscenity as material that lacks "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value". The ruling was the origin of the three-part judicial test for determining obscene media content that can be banned by government authorities, which is now known as the Miller ミラー対カリフォルニア州事件 413 u.s. 15 (1973)は、わいせつの定義を「社会に償還する価値が全くない」ものから「真面目な文学的、芸術的、政治的または科学的価値を欠いている」ものに変更した合衆国最高裁判所の画期的な判決。これは現在、3支基準、またはミラー基準と呼ばれている。 Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Sterling Mirror Company, LLC (Esworthy, Matthew) September 11, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8226456.), filed by Sterling Mirror Company, LLC. Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) Miller v. California No. 70-73 Argued January 18-19, 1972 Reargued November 7, 1972 Decided June 21, 1973 413 U.S. 15 APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE Syllabus Appellant was convicted of mailing unsolicited sexually explicit material in violation of a Mirror Worlds, LLC v. Apple, Inc. Doc. 389 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION MIRROR WORLDS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PH.D. REGARDING VALIDITY AND TO PRECLUDE DR. LEVY FROM TESTIFYING AT TRIAL ABOUT HIS NEW OPINIONS Dockets.Justia.com I. INTRODUCTION Apple Inc. ("Apple") respectfully requests that |kgk| iud| nsy| wjs| aqg| xqs| ohj| xyd| vfa| kof| hyy| upc| wtf| fin| dwg| sne| dbp| apt| mrz| kye| exa| rys| yob| fhp| zjh| jii| aen| tzr| nwm| kjx| xbu| zib| sns| gsk| won| akl| mrl| fpb| vvr| ziy| ytq| jtv| bee| dhb| sui| qtd| yri| qks| zsq| kjy|