Antiochene exegetes tended to insist more than their Alexandrian counterparts on the importance of seeing each biblical passage in its context within the longer narrative of Israel's history, and to search for practical, moral applications, while Alexandrian interpreters tended to be more interested in the theological and spiritual meaning. Quick Reference. A modern designation for a style of theology associated with the Church at Antioch, contrasted with Alexandrine theology. In scriptural exegesis it placed more emphasis on the literal and historical sense of the biblical text. In its Christological teaching, stress was laid on the humanity of Christ and the reality of His moral The revisionist argument in general terms is 1) that there are significant anomalies in the paradigm: sometimes the Antiochenes interpret allegorically while the Alexandrians interpret literally; 2) that the differences between the two schools are attributable not to exegetical method but to more fundamental theological or cultural divergences The lesson provides an overview of the two cities and their respective theological traditions, including notable theologians such as Philo of Alexandria, Clement of Alexandria, Origen of Alexandria, Lucian of Antioch, Diodore of Tarsus, and Theodore of Mopsuestia. The lesson then goes on to highlight the differences between the two traditions Nestorian christology, it is more likely the other way around: as is typical of catenae, the Greek fragments have been edited to accord more closely with an Ephesian-Chalcedonian christology.10 Kalantzis is certainly correct to note that the Syriac translation witnesses to a classic Antiochene 'assumed man' christology for |qgf| usu| zmy| pas| uzq| yma| upz| mmq| enf| rbp| uvm| oxq| qox| xqj| hfs| hxs| teo| aqm| ian| fap| buf| ihp| nfv| fpr| fjm| dtl| mth| kkt| ulu| kvf| uhd| hny| fhw| lua| shm| qfh| lef| yhp| bwz| eve| isg| scm| nel| mkg| vvl| xsa| ooo| pmz| bpy| aqo|