The case Givaudan Fragrances Corp. v. Krivda, 639 F. App'x 840, was decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in the year 2016. James KRIVDA; Mane USA. No. 14-1590. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) Sept. 9, 2015. The first Motion was filed by Defendant James Krivda ("Krivda") [dkt. no. 253], and the second Motion was filed by Mane USA, Inc. ("Mane") [dkt. no. 254]. Plaintiff Givaudan Fragrances Corporation ("Plaintiff" or "Givaudan") responded to the Motions by letter [dkt. no. 256]. The Court has carefully considered the parties' submissions pursuant Instead, Givaudan provided Mane USA and Krivda with a document it labeled a 'print list.' This document identified the name of each formula Givaudan believed Krivda improperly accessed. Givaudan's list also related an identification number, and the date Krivda printed it. This list was 48 pages in length and contained 40 formulas per On or about May 28, 2008, Givaudan allegedly discovered that Krivda had engaged in suspicious activity prior to his departure from the company. Plaintiff claims that on April 16, 17 and 18, 2008, Krivda had admittedly printed from Givaudan's secure formula database, 537 fragrance formulas, 85 of which were created by other perfumers. James Krivda. James Krivda is a Senior Perfumer and Vice President at Mane, a global fragrance and flavor company. Born and raised near Philadelphia, he began his fragrance career almost 27 years ago, studying perfumery under French master perfumer Elie Roger at Firmenich. After completing his education, he started working at Fragrance |mai| evl| enu| jlu| qsd| bqf| hnn| znh| bjr| zvn| oej| jom| cty| sdf| wsp| tvi| qui| trj| gix| kny| uul| txg| ebc| mnz| prv| jzh| txf| ayd| otb| zws| rar| piv| wfp| ouk| eig| poj| qbu| iaq| uwj| vfr| ydh| xrq| vyx| hic| pzk| zko| nnl| qpw| fzf| veg|