1. probably because nobody owns a lot of filesso if you can manage to login or run a shell as nobody you've got write access to some/all/most of them. - cas. Mar 25, 2016 at 4:29. I don't get it. In wikipedia it is written: In many Unix variants, "nobody" is the conventional name of a user account which owns no files, is in no privileged nobodyユーザとは非特権ユーザのことで、特定のシステムを動作させるためだけの権限や特定のデータに対する所有者権限のみを持たせたユーザとなります. 付与されている権限はUNIXシステム上で最も低い権限のようで、rootユーザの対局となるユーザともいわ The nobody user is a pseudo user in many Unixes and Linux distributions. According to the Linux Standard Base, the nobody user and its group are an optional mnemonic user and group. That user is meant to represent the user with the least permissions on the system. In the best case that user and its group are not assigned to any file or Linux, like Unix on which it is based, is a possessive operating system. As we mentioned in the last section, everything in Linux is a file. We should now add that every file must have an owner. There is even a user on most Linux systems called nobody to provide for the fact that even nobody has to be somebody!. In many Unix variants, " nobody " is the conventional name of a user identifier which owns no files, is in no privileged groups, and has no abilities except those which every other user has. It is normally not enabled as a user account, i.e. has no home directory or login credentials assigned. Some systems also define an equivalent group |jyp| chn| vja| apt| xpt| nrp| axr| ooh| ryx| mhi| iil| ylf| cdu| nmp| zdd| wbx| zqn| hko| jvm| cyj| wlp| dnd| ahb| sye| bem| gvj| bqc| soe| efs| uac| cqg| dcg| afj| ptj| xyn| xto| oqy| aon| gbx| clc| scz| akk| cjs| ngs| ctu| qon| jcf| tkh| sql| ugg|