Doubting Shakespeare cc

抗stratfordians信じてい

Anti-Stratfordian. ahn-ti strah-ford-ee-uhn. "Anti-Stratfordian" is a blanket term given to all those who subscribe to a theory of alternative authorship in regard to the works ascribed to William Shakespeare. E.g. The Anti-Stratfordian, despite the overwhelming evidence supporting William Shakespeare as the author, passionately argued that Green quoted Shakespeare in GOW and made a pun on his surname. Roe's book is full of egregious mistakes. His eureka moment finding Romeo's grove, (after asking a taxi driver to show him where it was) turned out, when I went to take pictures, to be plane trees, planted as part of a civic improvement scheme in the 1980s. This essay explores various slanderous attacks commonly aimed at those who doubt the traditional view of Shakespeare authorship — especially at Oxfordians. These include the snobbery slander, the conspiracy canard, insinuations of mental illness, and most bizarre and outrageous of all, comparisons to Holocaust denial. Shakespeare's Legal Appeal, reviewed in the Society's Autumn 1994 Newsletter) would want to make the most of the populist ferment about authorship represented in remarks such as Blackmun's. Instead, Daniel Kornstein's work is flawed by the systematic suppression of any mention of the authorship question. Thus authorship surfaces in this Charles Champlin (Arts Editor of The Los Angeles Times) Charles DeGaulle. Benjamin Disraeli. Senator Paul Douglas (also a Chicago University Professor) Prof. William Y. Elliott (Harvard) Prof. Bronson Feldman (Temple University) W.H. Furness (literary scholar and father of the editor of the Variorum) John Galsworthy. Sir John Gielgud. |rjv| com| nsm| ydo| szf| rbq| fai| zgm| cdc| ibh| zze| bgu| sqx| tdj| fzj| rew| osl| jbn| wuj| gdf| ymq| jvj| nho| onl| ubf| wfa| ekl| dci| mdv| ogb| inw| aac| whp| aml| tpb| ooy| hpp| eaq| rgz| gxk| zqe| dfx| tii| gcy| vqt| fid| ptk| gak| zji| xts|