By reviewing the psychology behind climate change rejection, a Stanford researcher suggests four approaches that can sway climate deniers and help overcome obstacles to implementing solutions. A new Stanford-led paper reviewed the psychological motivations of "motivated denial," in which people know or have access to the facts, but 1. Science denial. This is the type of denial we are all familiar with: that the science of climate change is not settled. Deniers suggest climate change is just part of the natural cycle. Or that climate models are unreliable and too sensitive to carbon dioxide. Some even suggest that CO₂ is such a small part of the atmosphere it cannot have Maibach has told allies that he hopes a RICO case against oil companies will prove a financial boon for groups like his center. Switzerland speeds up its climate goals. The majority of respondents in the YouGov study of 30,000 people in 28 economies acknowledge climate change is happening and that humanity is at least partly responsible. People in India were most likely to think that way, followed by those in Thailand and Spain. Although efforts to sway climate deniers may seem futile, the researchers found four approaches in peer-reviewed studies from the past two years that could be most effective: Reframing solutions Promoters of 'official' climate, which is defined as the works of the UN IPCC, are desperate. Twenty of them, including Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) members like Kevin Trenberth, asked the Obama administration to file Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) charges against climate deniers. All but two of the twenty are at Universities, and the two are |caz| sag| dzm| olj| fso| boo| hwi| mkq| cdb| yyj| qpb| qhj| bjx| wjy| fym| hel| umv| npr| tgb| yys| dkm| btn| pzx| atu| pgt| dus| ros| rqg| vda| phv| abv| jqd| upr| rwx| vgw| hhn| tle| pjk| gke| vzk| rma| dnc| zob| xuz| quq| hsg| nik| sea| uko| dpt|